First Article Inspection (FAI) Checklist — AS9102 Compliant

By Eric Davidson on May 23, 2026

first-article-inspection-(fai)-checklist-

A First Article Inspection (FAI) is the formal verification that a production process produces a part conforming to every requirement of engineering drawings and specifications before full-volume manufacturing begins. This checklist aligns with AS9102 Revision B — the aerospace industry standard — and applies equally to automotive, defense, and precision-parts manufacturing where dimensional accuracy, material conformance, and documented traceability are non-negotiable. Every section below maps directly to the three core Forms of a First Article Inspection Report (FAIR): Form 1 (Design Documentation), Form 2 (Product Accountability), and Form 3 (Characteristic Accountability). Work through each section in sequence, record the actual evidence against every line item, and use the Status column as a live tracker before submitting the package to your customer.

Run Your FAI Digitally — No Paper, No Gaps

iFactory digitizes every AS9102 form, captures dimensional data in real time, and auto-generates your FAIR package ready for customer submission.

Form 1

Section 1 — Design Documentation

Form 1 establishes that the design basis used for production is the authorized, current revision of every applicable document. Before any physical measurement begins, the quality team must confirm the design record is complete and controlled. Missing or superseded drawings are the most common cause of FAI rejection at customer submission — verifying this section first eliminates that risk entirely.

01§4.4.1

Drawing Revision Confirmed

Current revision of engineering drawing confirmed and on file via document control system review.

02§4.4.2

Specifications Identified

All applicable specifications listed on the drawing are identified through drawing cross-reference review.

03§4.4.3

Customer Design Data

Customer-supplied design data documented with revision level per customer communication records.

04§4.4.4

Change Documents Current

Change documents (ECOs, deviations, waivers) are current and authorized per ECO log review.

05§4.4.5

Sub-Tier Design Data

Supplier and sub-tier design data included where applicable per supply chain documentation review.

06§4.4.6

Regulatory Requirements

Safety and regulatory requirements identified, listed, and verified against the regulatory requirement matrix.

07§4.4.1

Drawing Notes Captured

Drawing notes and general tolerances extracted and captured in the FAIR documentation package.

Form 2

Section 2 — Product Accountability

Form 2 documents every raw material, standard part, and sub-assembly used in building the first article. The objective is complete traceability from finished part back to material heat lot, certification, and supplier. Aerospace and defense customers routinely audit Form 2 records years after delivery — every entry must be accurate, legible, and permanently linked to the part serial number.

01§4.5.2

Material Certs Verified

Raw material certifications match the drawing material specification per material cert review vs. drawing callout.

02§4.5.3

Heat / Lot Traceability

Material heat and lot numbers recorded and traceable via physical label vs. cert comparison.

03§4.5.4

Approved Supplier Source

Approved supplier source confirmed for each material against the Approved Supplier List (ASL).

04§4.5.5

Standard Parts Catalogued

All standard parts — fasteners, inserts, bearings — catalogued with part numbers per bill of materials reconciliation.

05§4.5.6

Sub-Tier FAIRs Available

Sub-tier FAIRs available for customer-designated critical parts confirmed through sub-tier FAIR package review.

06§4.5.7

Shelf-Life Confirmed

Shelf-life items verified within usable date at time of build via label date vs. build date comparison.

07§4.5.8

Special Process Materials

Special process materials — sealants, adhesives, coatings — documented per process sheet review.

08§4.5.1

Serial / Lot Number Assigned

Part serial or lot number assigned, recorded on Form 2, and confirmed via physical marking verification.

Replace Paper FAIR Packages with Digital Records

iFactory captures all Form 1, 2, and 3 entries digitally — with dimensional data, calibration links, and photo evidence — and compiles your FAIR for customer submission automatically.

Form 3

Section 3 — Characteristic Accountability

Form 3 is where the dimensional and functional verification happens. Every characteristic called out on the engineering drawing must be listed, measured, and recorded with the actual value — not just "pass" or "fail." Balloon numbers on the drawing must correspond one-for-one with Form 3 line items. This section is the core of the FAIR package and typically represents 80 percent of the inspection labor in a first article.

01§4.6.2

Characteristics Ballooned

All drawing characteristics ballooned and numbered sequentially confirmed through ballooned drawing review.

02§4.6.3

Nominal & Tolerance Recorded

Nominal dimension and tolerance recorded for each characteristic via drawing extraction to Form 3.

03§4.6.4

Actual Values Numeric

Actual measured value recorded as numeric data — not pass/fail — for each line via CMM or gauge measurement.

04§4.6.5

Equipment Identified

Measurement equipment identified with calibration certificate number confirmed through calibration database check.

05§4.6.5

Calibration Current

Calibration due dates confirmed as current for all gauges used via calibration due date review.

06§4.6.6

GD&T Features Verified

True position, flatness, and runout features verified with appropriate CMM equipment per CMM report review.

07§4.6.7

Surface Finish Recorded

Surface finish measurements recorded where specified on drawing via profilometer or comparator reading.

08§4.6.8

Functional Characteristics

Functional characteristics — torque, pressure, flow — tested and recorded per functional test records.

09§4.6.9

Visual Characteristics

Cosmetic, marking, and finish characteristics documented with photographic evidence from visual inspection.

10§4.6.10

Out-of-Tolerance Findings

Out-of-tolerance findings documented with deviation or waiver reference via non-conformance record review.

Sec 4

Section 4 — Special Processes

Special processes — heat treatment, plating, welding, non-destructive testing, chemical conversion coating — cannot be verified by dimensional measurement alone. Each must be performed by a qualified supplier on the customer-approved process source list and accompanied by a process certification conforming to the applicable specification. Missing process certifications are among the top three reasons aerospace FAIRs are returned without acceptance.

01§4.7.1

Processes Identified

All special processes identified from drawing notes and specifications via drawing review against the process list.

02§4.7.2

Approved Source Verified

Special process suppliers verified on the customer-approved source list (APSL) before processing begins.

03§4.7.3

Process Certifications

Process certifications obtained and confirmed to match the specification revision per cert review vs. drawing callout.

04§4.7.4

NDT Reports On File

NDT reports — ultrasonic, dye penetrant, magnetic particle — on file and reviewed for completeness.

05§4.7.5

Heat Treatment Records

Heat treatment furnace records and time-temperature charts available and confirmed through furnace record review.

06§4.7.6

Weld Procedure Qualified

Weld procedure qualifications (WPS/PQR) confirmed as current and applicable through weld procedure package review.

Sec 5

Section 5 — Approval and Submission

The FAIR package is complete only when all three forms are reviewed, signed by the authorized Quality representative, and submitted with the complete supporting documentation package. Incomplete submissions — missing certs, unsigned forms, or unballooned drawings — restart the customer review clock. This section confirms every element of the submission package before it leaves the facility.

01§4.9.1

Forms Complete

Form 1, Form 2, and Form 3 completed with no blank fields confirmed through form completeness review.

02§4.9.2

QA Signature & Date

Quality representative signature and date confirmed on all three forms via signature block verification.

03§4.9.3

Ballooned Drawing Included

Ballooned drawing included in the submission package confirmed through package content check.

04§4.9.4

Certs Indexed & Attached

All material certifications and process certs indexed and attached per document index review.

05§4.9.5

CMM Reports Included

CMM printouts or dimensional reports included in the package confirmed through package content check.

06§4.9.6

NCRs Documented

Non-conformances and dispositions documented and included per non-conformance record (NCR) log review.

07§4.9.7

Customer Requirements Met

Customer-specific supplemental requirements addressed per customer FAIR requirements review.

08§4.9.8

Submission Confirmed

Submission transmitted via customer-specified method with delivery confirmation recorded.

Guide

How to Use This Checklist

Work through sections in sequence: design documentation first, then material traceability, then dimensional verification, then special processes, and finally submission review. Each card maps to an AS9102 clause so your team can cross-reference the standard directly. For organizations managing multiple concurrent FAIs across different part numbers and customers, a digital FAI platform surfaces every open item, overdue section, and pending certification across all active FAIRs without the manual tracking overhead of spreadsheets.

Scope

Full FAI vs. Partial FAI

AS9102 distinguishes between a full FAIR and a partial FAIR. A full FAIR is required for new part numbers, any design change affecting fit, form, or function, after a production lapse exceeding two years, after a change in manufacturing facility or process, and when a customer specifically requires one following a corrective action. A partial FAIR addresses only the forms and characteristics affected by a specific change. The scope decision must always be documented, and when there is any ambiguity, customer quality concurrence should be obtained before proceeding with a partial approach.

Full FAI Required When

  • New part number being introduced
  • Design change affecting fit, form, or function
  • Production lapse exceeding two years
  • Change in manufacturing facility or process
  • Customer requires one following corrective action

Partial FAI Applies When

  • Only specific forms or characteristics affected by a change
  • Scope decision is fully documented in the FAIR package
  • Customer quality concurrence obtained in writing
  • No ambiguity in which characteristics are impacted
  • Previous full FAIR on record for the same part number
AS9102
Revision B Alignment
3
Core FAIR Forms Covered
39
Checklist Line Items
100%
Digital Traceability on iFactory
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a First Article Inspection (FAI)?

A First Article Inspection is a documented verification process confirming that a production process is capable of producing a part that meets all engineering drawing and specification requirements. It is performed before committing to full-volume production runs. The inspection results are compiled into a First Article Inspection Report (FAIR), which serves as the formal evidence of conformance.

What does AS9102 require for a FAIR?

AS9102 Revision B requires a FAIR to address three forms: Form 1 (Design Documentation — confirming the authorized design record), Form 2 (Product Accountability — documenting materials, parts, and sub-assemblies with traceability), and Form 3 (Characteristic Accountability — recording actual measured values for every drawing characteristic). All three must be signed by an authorized Quality representative before submission.

Does this checklist apply to automotive parts?

Yes. While AS9102 is the aerospace standard, the structure of this checklist — design documentation, material traceability, dimensional verification, special process certification, and submission completeness — applies directly to automotive FAI processes. Automotive customers may reference PPAP under AIAG requirements, which shares significant overlap with AS9102. This checklist covers the shared core. Customer-specific PPAP elements such as control plans and process capability studies require supplemental documentation.

When is a full FAI required versus a partial FAI?

A full FAI is required for new part numbers, after any design change affecting fit, form, or function, after a production lapse exceeding two years, after a change in manufacturing location or process, and when specifically required by the customer following a corrective action. A partial FAI covers only the forms and characteristics directly affected by a specific change. The scope decision must be documented and confirmed with the customer quality team before proceeding.

Can iFactory generate the FAIR report package automatically?

Yes. iFactory's digital FAI module captures all Form 1, 2, and 3 data during the inspection process and compiles the complete FAIR package — including dimensional data, calibration records, material certifications, and photographic evidence — into a formatted report ready for customer submission. Teams can initiate, assign, execute, and close a FAI entirely within the platform without any paper-based forms or manual document assembly.

What are the most common reasons a FAIR is rejected by a customer?

The most common rejection reasons are: missing or unsigned forms, out-of-date material certifications or expired special process approvals, actual measurement values recorded as pass/fail rather than numeric values, missing or incorrectly ballooned drawing, characteristic count mismatch between the drawing and Form 3, and special processes performed by suppliers not on the customer-approved source list. This checklist is structured to address each of these failure modes before submission.

How long should FAI records be retained?

AS9102 does not specify a retention period — that is established by the customer contract or applicable regulatory requirement. Aerospace programs commonly require retention for the life of the program plus a defined period after last delivery, which can extend 10 to 25 years or more for defense and commercial aviation programs. All FAIR documentation should be stored in a controlled, retrievable format with audit-trail logging.

How is calibration documented in a FAIR?

Each measurement instrument used during a FAI must be identified in Form 3 by its unique equipment ID, with the current calibration certificate number and expiration date on record. Measurements taken with out-of-calibration instruments are invalid and require re-measurement with certified equipment. iFactory links directly to calibration records so inspectors are notified if a selected instrument is expired before recording any measurements.

See Digital FAI Running on Your Part Numbers

Book a 30-minute working session and the iFactory team will walk through your current FAI process and demonstrate how the platform handles your AS9102 requirements — with your actual parts and customers in mind.


Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!