Absorption and Stripping Column Optimization

By David Cook on October 3, 2026

absorption-stripping-column-optimization

Absorption and stripping columns remove carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, water and volatile organics from gas streams across chemical plants, refineries and gas processing. Amine units, glycol dehydrators and chemical scrubbers all work on the same principle: a solvent picks up the unwanted component in an absorber and gives it up again in a regenerator. The difficulty is running them well. Too little solvent circulation and the treated gas goes off spec; too much and reboiler steam is wasted. Rich loading that creeps up brings corrosion, and contaminants bring foaming and degradation. This guide covers how the loop works, amine and glycol choices, loadings, regenerator energy, foaming, heat-stable salts and how continuous optimization holds the unit at its best point. To see your unit’s operating window, book a short walkthrough.

Gas treating · Absorption and stripping

Absorption and Stripping Column Optimization: Amine, Glycol and Scrubber Units at Their Best Point

Circulation, lean loading and reboiler duty held at the minimum that keeps treated gas on spec, with rich loading, foaming and solvent health watched before they cost a trip or a corrosion failure.

Why it matters
3.6–3.8 GJ/t
Regeneration energy per tonne of CO2 for 30 wt% MEA in pilot testing (Applied Energy)
7 lb/MMscf
Common pipeline water specification met by TEG dehydration (Bryan Research and Engineering)
2 wt%
Heat-stable salt level MDEA units commonly aim to stay below
What goes wrong in absorber and regenerator loops
Problem, what happens and consequence
Over-stripping
Reboiler duty above what lean loading needs
Consequence: Wasted steam
Rich loading too high
Solvent carries more acid gas than the metallurgy allows
Consequence: Corrosion
Foaming
Hydrocarbons, fines or degradation products stabilize foam
Consequence: Carryover and off-spec gas
Heat-stable salts
Acids form salts that regeneration cannot remove
Consequence: Lost capacity, corrosion
Glycol losses
Degradation or carryover from the contactor
Consequence: Wet gas, high makeup
01The problem

Why Gas Treating Units Run Away From Their Best Point

An absorber and regenerator loop has one job: meet a treated gas specification at the lowest cost. In practice, most units run with generous margins. Operators raise circulation and reboiler steam to stay safely on spec, because an off-spec event is visible and costly while wasted steam is quiet. Over months, those margins become the normal way of running.

Regeneration energy is the main operating cost. Pilot testing of 30 wt% monoethanolamine (MEA) for carbon dioxide capture, published in Applied Energy, reported regeneration energy of about 3.6–3.8 GJ per tonne of carbon dioxide, with an optimum near 3.46 GJ/t at the best lean loading. Small changes in lean loading and circulation move that number noticeably.

3.46 GJ/t
best regeneration energy found in MEA pilot testing
Applied Energy
0.2
optimal lean loading, mol CO2 per mol MEA, in that study
Applied Energy
7 lb/MMscf
typical pipeline water limit for glycol units
Bryan Research and Engineering

Margins also hide risks. Rich loading that creeps up during high throughput accelerates corrosion. Contaminants build up and cause foaming. Heat-stable salts accumulate slowly until capacity has fallen and corrosion has started. Each of these shows in the data long before it becomes an incident.

Continuous optimization holds the unit close to its best point while watching those risks. We can review your unit data on a call.

02How the loop works

The Absorber and Regenerator Loop

All solvent-based gas treating units share the same loop.

Absorber or contactor
Gas flows up against lean solvent flowing down over trays or packing. The solvent picks up carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide or water.
Rich solvent
Solvent leaving the absorber, loaded with absorbed gas. Its loading is expressed as moles of acid gas per mole of amine.
Lean-rich exchanger
Hot lean solvent heats the cold rich solvent, recovering heat before regeneration.
Regenerator or stripper
Steam from the reboiler strips the absorbed gas out of the solvent at higher temperature and lower pressure.
Lean solvent
Regenerated solvent, cooled and returned to the absorber. Its residual loading sets how clean the treated gas can be.
Reclaiming and filtration
Side streams remove solids, degradation products and heat-stable salts to keep the solvent healthy.

Three variables decide most of the unit’s performance: solvent circulation rate, lean loading and solvent strength. Circulation and strength set how much acid gas the solvent can carry. Lean loading, set by reboiler duty, sets how clean the treated gas can be and how much steam is used.

Finding the best combination for today’s gas is what optimization does. See the operating window in a demo.

03Solvent choice

Amine and Glycol Choices

Different solvents suit different jobs. Typical strengths quoted in industry references are shown below; each plant sets its own limits.

SolventTypical strengthTypical useNotes
MEAAbout 20 wt% for H2S and CO2, about 30 wt% for CO2 onlyCO2 removal, carbon captureReactive, higher regeneration energy, degrades
DEA25–35 wt%Refinery and gas plant treatingLess reactive than MEA
MDEA30–55 wt%H2S treating with partial CO2 slipLower regeneration energy, often activated for CO2
DGA40–50 wt%Gas treatingHigh concentration, low circulation
TEGAbout 98.8–99.9 wt% leanNatural gas dehydrationStripping gas needed for the highest purity
Caustic or chemical scrubbersVariesAcid gas and VOC scrubbingOnce-through or regenerated, depending on chemistry

MDEA is popular where hydrogen sulfide must be removed while some carbon dioxide can pass through, because it reacts more slowly with carbon dioxide and needs less regeneration energy. Activated MDEA blends add a faster-reacting amine when carbon dioxide must be removed too.

Solvent strength drifts in operation through water balance and losses. Running weaker than intended reduces capacity and raises loading; running stronger can increase corrosion and viscosity. Regular lab analysis, linked to the unit model, keeps strength where it should be.

Our engineers can review whether your solvent strength and type still fit your gas.

04Loading and energy

Lean Loading, Rich Loading and Reboiler Steam

Loading links treating performance, energy and corrosion. Lean loading drives energy; rich loading drives corrosion.

Example: holding lean loading on target
Lean loading target for spec gas0.12 mol/mol
Actual lean loading, over-stripped0.07 mol/mol
Reboiler steam at actual42 t/h
Reboiler steam at target, from unit model37 t/h
Saving42 − 37 = 5 t/h of steam
Steam savedAbout 12%, gas still on spec

Illustrative. The right lean loading depends on solvent, gas and specification and is set from your own unit model.

Rich loading limits are specific to each unit. A Digital Refining case study of an MEA unit described a maximum rich loading of 0.35 mol/mol for carbon steel equipment, while a gas plant optimization study for an activated MDEA unit used 0.53 mol/mol as its limit. The limit depends on solvent, metallurgy, temperature and velocity, so it should come from the plant’s own corrosion assessment.

Optimization works inside both limits at once: lean loading high enough to avoid wasting steam, low enough to keep gas on spec, and rich loading safely below the corrosion limit. Circulation is the lever that connects them.

Most units have room to save steam inside their existing limits. Ask our team to estimate yours.

05Foaming

Foaming: Causes, Signals and Response

Foaming is one of the most disruptive problems in amine units. It reduces capacity, carries solvent into downstream equipment and can push treated gas off spec within minutes.

Cause
Liquid hydrocarbons

Condensed hydrocarbons in the feed gas lower surface tension and stabilize foam.

Cause
Fine solids

Iron sulfide and other fines stabilize foam bubbles.

Cause
Degradation products

Heat-stable salts and amine degradation products raise foaming tendency.

Cause
Surfactants

Well treating chemicals, corrosion inhibitors and even excess antifoam.

Signal
Differential pressure

A sudden rise in absorber or regenerator differential pressure.

Signal
Level swings

Erratic sump level and solvent carryover to knock-out drums.

Antifoam treats the symptom; removing the cause is the lasting fix. Better inlet separation, filtration and reclaiming reduce foaming tendency. Engineering sources note that too much antifoam can itself promote foaming, so dosing should be measured, not habitual.

Early detection gives operators time. Differential pressure, level and treated gas analysis together show a foaming event starting, often minutes before the specification is lost, which is enough time to cut throughput or dose antifoam deliberately.

Linking foaming events to their causes shows which ones recur. We include that analysis in every rollout.

06Solvent health

Heat-Stable Salts, Degradation and Glycol Health

Solvent quality declines slowly and silently. Tracking it prevents capacity loss and corrosion.

1
Heat-stable salts

Formed when amine reacts with acids stronger than CO2 or H2S. Regeneration cannot remove them, so they build up and tie up amine.

2
Set action levels

Industry references suggest keeping MDEA heat-stable salts below about 2 wt% and reclaiming at about 4 wt% total anions; plants set their own limits.

3
Thermal and oxidative degradation

High reboiler temperatures and oxygen ingress break down amine, raising makeup and foaming tendency.

4
Glycol regeneration limits

TEG decomposes above about 404 °F, so reboiler temperature is held below that, typically near 400 °F, giving about 98.8 wt% lean glycol.

5
Stripping gas for dry gas

Reaching purities up to about 99.9 wt% for low dew points needs stripping gas, at a fuel cost.

6
Circulation discipline

Bryan Research and Engineering cites about 3 gallons of TEG per pound of water removed as a typical circulation rate.

Lab data and process data together tell the story. Rising heat-stable salts with rising corrosion probe readings, or rising glycol losses with higher contactor temperature, point directly to the cause.

Solvent health becomes a scheduled task instead of a surprise. Discuss it with our specialists.

07Manual or optimized

Margin-Based Operation Versus Continuous Optimization

The difference between running on margins and running on a model shows in steam use and risk.

Margin-based operation
  • Circulation set high and left there
  • Reboiler duty set for worst-case gas
  • Rich loading checked occasionally
  • Foaming handled after it starts
  • Solvent analysis reviewed monthly
  • Steam use treated as fixed
Continuous optimization
  • Circulation matched to current gas
  • Lean loading held at the spec target
  • Rich loading kept below site limit
  • Foaming precursors watched
  • Solvent health trended with process data
  • Steam per tonne treated tracked daily

Optimization does not remove safety margins. It replaces vague margins with explicit limits, such as the maximum rich loading and the treated gas specification, and runs as close to the economic point as those limits allow.

Recommendations start in advisory mode, reviewed by your engineers. See how in a session.

08Checklist

Absorber and Regenerator Checklist

Use this checklist to set up continuous optimization on a gas treating unit.

Measurements
Feed and treated gas analysis
Solvent circulation and strength
Reboiler steam and temperatures
Absorber and regenerator differential pressure
Limits
Treated gas specification
Maximum rich loading for your metallurgy
Reboiler temperature limits
Pump and column hydraulic limits
Solvent health
Heat-stable salts trended
Degradation products tracked
Filtration and reclaiming schedule
Antifoam use recorded
Performance
Steam per tonne acid gas removed
Lean and rich loading trends
Foaming events with causes
Solvent makeup rate

Most units already measure what is needed. Combining it into one view is the first step of an absorber review.

09Business case

What Absorber Optimization Is Worth

Value comes from steam saved and incidents avoided.

Lower steam use
Reboiler duty matched to the lean loading the specification needs.
Fewer off-spec events
Foaming and capacity limits seen before they affect treated gas.
Less corrosion
Rich loading held below the site limit.
Lower solvent cost
Degradation and losses reduced through better solvent management.
More capacity
Healthy solvent and stable hydraulics allow higher throughput.

Regeneration energy dominates the operating cost of amine units, which is why even modest improvements in lean loading control matter. The MEA pilot data show the spread between typical and optimal operation; your unit’s own data will show where it sits on that range.

A few weeks of unit data are usually enough for a first estimate. Book one with our advisors.

10iFactory

How iFactory Delivers Absorber Optimization

iFactory Absorber Optimizer models your amine, glycol or scrubber unit from plant data, recommends circulation and reboiler duty for today’s gas and watches rich loading, foaming and solvent health continuously.
01
Unit model

Calibrated on your own absorber and regenerator data.

02
Setpoint advice

Circulation and lean loading for current gas.

03
Corrosion guard

Rich loading tracked against your site limit.

04
Foaming watch

Differential pressure, level and precursors together.

05
Solvent health

Lab results trended with process conditions.

06
Energy tracking

Steam per tonne treated reported daily.

It runs on premises beside your DCS and historian. Share a month of unit data and we will show your operating window in a working session.

Unit review

Find the Steam Your Regenerator Does Not Need

Share a month of absorber, regenerator and lab data. We build the operating window, check rich loading against your limits and estimate the steam saving at your current specification.

Illustrative alert
Amine unit · Regenerator and rich loading

Rich loading has climbed to 0.46 mol/mol against a site corrosion limit of 0.50. Circulation can rise 6% within pump limits, which restores margin at a small reboiler steam cost.

Rich loading vs site limit0.46 / 0.50

Window
This shift
Action
Raise circulation, recheck lean loading
11In practice

Rich Loading Caught During a Rate Increase

This exchange shows how a process engineer might use iFactory.

Process engineer and iFactory AI
Engineer
We raised gas rate 8% this morning. How is the amine unit?
iFactory AI
Treated gas is on spec, but rich loading has climbed to 0.46 mol/mol against your site limit of 0.50 and is still rising.
Engineer
What do you recommend?
iFactory AI
Raise circulation 6%. The pumps have margin, and the model shows rich loading settling near 0.43 with about 3% more reboiler steam. Lean loading can stay where it is.
Engineer
Do it and watch regenerator differential pressure.
iFactory AI
Recommendation logged for the board operator. I will alert you if regenerator differential pressure rises more than 10% above its normal range.
Turnkey hardware and software

iFactory ships as a pre-configured NVIDIA AI server, racked and ready with the absorber and regenerator optimization models loaded. Rack it, plug in power and Ethernet, and the AI is live on your network. Our scope covers data connections across process units, utilities and the control room, DCS, PLC/SCADA, historian, LIMS and CMMS integration, cabling and network setup, operator and engineer training, and 24×7 remote monitoring. Recommendations run in advisory mode first, and nothing writes to your control system without your management of change approval.

Weeks 1–4
Ship, network, data

Server installed, DCS and historian links live, historical process, lab and maintenance data loaded.

Weeks 5–8
Train models, pilot

Models calibrated on your own unit data, then run in advisory mode on one unit with your process engineers reviewing every recommendation.

Weeks 9–12
Go live, train teams

Rollout to the agreed units under your management of change, operator and engineer training, and 24×7 remote monitoring in place.

Software, server and integration come as one package. For pricing on your site, contact our sales team.

FAQQuestions

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main operating cost of an amine unit?

Reboiler steam for regeneration. Pilot testing of 30 wt% MEA reported about 3.6–3.8 GJ per tonne of CO2, with an optimum near 3.46 GJ/t at the best lean loading.

What limits rich loading?

Mainly corrosion. Limits are unit-specific: one MEA case study used 0.35 mol/mol for carbon steel, while an activated MDEA study used 0.53 mol/mol. Plants set their own limit from metallurgy and conditions.

What causes amine foaming?

Liquid hydrocarbons, fine solids such as iron sulfide, degradation products and heat-stable salts, and surfactants including excess antifoam.

What are heat-stable salts?

Salts formed when amine reacts with acids stronger than CO2 or H2S. Regeneration cannot remove them, so they reduce capacity and raise corrosion unless reclaimed.

How does TEG dehydration reach pipeline spec?

By regenerating glycol to about 98.8 wt% in the reboiler, below its decomposition temperature, and using stripping gas when higher purity is needed for lower dew points.

How long does it take to set up?

A first unit can typically be optimized within a 6–12 week rollout, starting in advisory mode. Plan it with our engineers.

Next step

Run Your Gas Treating Unit at Its Best Point

iFactory matches circulation and reboiler duty to today’s gas, keeps rich loading inside your limits and watches foaming and solvent health, cutting steam without risking the specification.

Illustrative dashboard view
Reboiler steam per tonne acid gas, last 6 weeks
Week 11.00

Week 20.97

Week 30.95

Week 40.93

Week 50.92

Week 60.91

Illustrative, indexed to week 1. Steam fell as lean loading was held to target instead of over-stripping.


Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!