Steel Plant SBTi Target Setting Guide for Corporate Boards

By James Smith on October 13, 2026

steel-plant-sbti-target-setting-guide-for-corporate-boards

When a steel company announces a science-based target, it is making a public promise that investors, customers and regulators will test against its own numbers. That is why the decision belongs in the boardroom, and why it cannot be made well without a clean emissions inventory underneath it. Setting a target through the Science Based Targets initiative, known as SBTi, means choosing a boundary, a pathway and a timeline the company can actually track. For steel, the sector pathway, the heavy Scope 1 share and the long Scope 3 chain all shape that choice. Boards and sustainability teams can see how iFactory AI builds a Scope 1, 2 and 3 inventory ready for target setting before drafting a commitment.

Board Guide to SBTi

Steel Plant SBTi Target Setting Guide for Corporate Boards

Understand the pathway, the boundary and the evidence a steel company needs before it commits to a science-based target.

Illustrative emissions pathway








Base yearNear-term targetLong-term target

Why This Is a Board Decision

A science-based target shapes capital plans for a decade or more. Three reasons put it on the board agenda.

Capital

Meeting the pathway steers investment in furnaces, power supply and raw materials.

Credibility

A public target invites scrutiny from investors, lenders and customers.

Accountability

Progress must be reported against a fixed baseline, year after year.

A target set without reliable data tends to be restated later. Restatements damage trust faster than a modest, well-evidenced commitment.

Near-Term and Long-Term Targets

SBTi expects companies to set targets over two horizons. Criteria and standards are updated periodically, so confirm the current versions on the SBTi website before you commit.

Near-term target
Covers roughly five to ten years ahead
Aligned with a 1.5 degree pathway for Scope 1 and 2
Scope 3 targets apply where criteria require them
Drives the current capital and operating plan
Long-term target
Reaches a net-zero point no later than mid-century
Requires deep cuts across the value chain
Limits use of offsets to residual emissions
Frames technology choices such as new iron making routes

Choosing a Target Method for Steel

Steel has its own sector guidance, so the method differs from a generic company. A method selection session on your own inventory shows how each would apply.

MethodHow It WorksFit for Steel
Sector intensity pathwayTargets emissions per tonne of crude steel, converging on a sector pathwayOften suits producers whose output changes over time
Absolute contractionCuts total emissions by a set percentage each yearClear and simple, but can penalise growth
Supplier engagementCommits suppliers to set their own targetsUseful for Scope 3 from ore, coal and scrap

Check the current SBTi iron and steel guidance for the exact pathway, scope and eligibility rules that apply to your route and products.

See Your Inventory Mapped to a Target Boundary

Book a 30-minute session and iFactory AI will show how Scope 1, 2 and 3 data are organised by source, so a board can see what a target would cover.

Where Steel Emissions Sit by Scope

Knowing the boundary first prevents surprises later. The examples below show typical sources for steel.

Scope 1

Coke ovens, blast furnaces, basic oxygen furnaces, flaring, on-site fuel and process gases.

Scope 2

Purchased electricity, steam and heat, with a large share for electric arc furnaces.

Scope 3

Iron ore, coking coal, purchased scrap and alloys, transport and use of sold products.

A Board Readiness Scorecard

Before committing, ask whether the evidence is ready. The illustrative scorecard below shows the kind of view a board should expect.

QuestionStatusWhat It Means
Base year inventory complete?ReadyScope 1 and 2 verified for a chosen year
Scope 3 screened?PartialMajor categories identified, data quality varies
Production data linked?ReadyTonnes available for intensity targets
Reduction plan costed?GapProjects not yet tied to capital budgets

From Draft to Submission

Preparing a submission is a project with owners, not a document. Five stages cover the ground.

1

Inventory

Build a verified base year across scopes.

Sustainability
2

Pathway

Choose method, scope and target years.

Strategy
3

Roadmap

Cost the projects that deliver the target.

Plant and CFO
4

Approval

Board reviews risks, costs and disclosure.

Board
5

Submit

Prepare evidence and respond to review.

Sustainability

Common Pitfalls

Four mistakes cause most delays and restatements.

Weak base year

An unusual year or incomplete data gives an unstable baseline.

Boundary drift

Changing what is included between years breaks comparability.

No funded plan

A target with no costed projects behind it is hard to defend.

Scope 3 ignored

Raw material emissions are often large and need early data work.

Where iFactory AI Fits

iFactory AI builds the data foundation behind a target, linking energy, production and cost to emissions by scope.

Scope 1, 2 and 3 inventory

Activity data is converted to emissions with stated factors and a clear audit trail.

Intensity per tonne

Emissions are tied to production, so intensity targets can be tracked by route and unit.

Progress against pathway

Actual emissions are shown against the target path, with the drivers behind any gap.

Ask in plain language

Ask where intensity moved this quarter and receive the ranked drivers with their basis.

Delivered turnkey, live in 6-12 weeks

iFactory AI arrives pre-configured on an NVIDIA server that ships racked and ready with software pre-loaded. Scope covers cabling, network, ERP and MES integration, team training and 24x7 remote monitoring.

Weeks 1-4
Ship, network and connect energy and production data
Weeks 5-8
Build the inventory and validate against reports
Weeks 9-12
Go live, train teams and hand over tracking views

Frequently Asked Questions

What does SBTi validation involve for a steel company?

A company submits its targets and supporting data, and SBTi reviews them against its criteria and sector guidance. Requirements and processes change, so confirm current rules on the SBTi website. You can watch the data foundation for a submission built on sample plant data in a live session.

Should a steel company use intensity or absolute targets?

It depends on the sector guidance, growth plans and how the board wants to communicate progress. Intensity per tonne suits changing output, while absolute targets are easier to explain. To compare both on your data, request a method comparison with the iFactory AI team, or ask support what inventory data to share.

How early should we work on Scope 3 data?

Early. Raw materials and purchased inputs often make up a large share of the footprint, and supplier data takes time to collect. A screening exercise shows which categories matter most. A short product tour of Scope 3 screening views shows what is possible from existing data.

Can we meet a target without changing our iron making route?

Efficiency, renewable power and scrap use help, but deep long-term cuts in a blast furnace route usually need technology change. The roadmap should show which measures deliver which share of the target. See how reduction levers are sized against a pathway in a guided walkthrough.

How do we report progress to the board each year?

Show emissions and intensity against the pathway, the drivers behind any variance and the status of funded projects. Keep the boundary and factors constant, and explain any change. Schedule a walkthrough of board-level progress reporting to see the view directors would receive.

Commit to a Target You Can Evidence

iFactory AI builds the emissions inventory and tracking behind a science-based target. Book a walkthrough to see it built around your own plant.


Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!