Uster Classimat: Best Yarn Clearing Settings

By James Smith on July 24, 2026

uster-classimat-yarn-fault-classification-clearing

A winding room supervisor at a ring-spinning mill pulls last night's clearer report and finds the same story again — efficiency down two points on three machines, and nobody can say whether it is the clearing curve, the raw cotton lot, or a drafting fault upstream. The Classimat report sitting in the quality office has the answer, but it is printed once a shift and read by one person. Ninety percent of the mill never sees the fault classes driving their downtime. Book a demo to see live Classimat fault data connected across your spinning and winding floor.

YARN QUALITY · USTER CLASSIMAT · FAULT CLEARING

Uster Classimat Yarn Fault Classification — Reading the Fault Chart and Setting the Clearing Curve That Actually Works

Classimat divides seldom-occurring yarn faults into standard classes by cross-section and length. Getting the clearing curve right means understanding exactly which classes are objectionable for your yarn count and end use, not applying a factory-default setting across every article.

23
Standard Fault Classes in Classimat Classification
1968
Year the First Classifying System Reached the Market
+100%
Minimum Cross-Section Deviation Counted as a Yarn Fault
WHY FAULT CLASSIFICATION EXISTS

Imperfections Are Frequent. Faults Are Rare. The Classimat System Exists for the Rare Ones

Every spun yarn carries variation. Thin places, thick places, and neps that occur at high frequency are imperfections, tracked continuously on the Uster Evenness Tester and reported per thousand metres. Faults are a different animal entirely — seldom-occurring, larger deviations of a hundred percent or more in cross-section over a length of one millimetre or longer, the kind that shows up as a visible defect in the finished fabric and triggers a customer claim months after the yarn shipped.

The Classimat exists to catch that second category. Because faults occur rarely, they cannot be represented meaningfully as an average — a mill needs the actual count, sorted into standard classes, so a clearer can be set to remove only the faults that matter and leave winding efficiency intact.

This distinction matters commercially as much as technically. A yarn lot can carry an excellent evenness result and still generate customer complaints if its fault-class distribution is poor, because the evenness figure averages out exactly the rare, severe deviations a fabric inspector will spot on the roll. Treating Classimat data as a secondary check rather than a core acceptance criterion is one of the most common gaps between a spinner's internal quality sign-off and a buyer's actual experience of the yarn.

SYSTEM EVOLUTION

From 16 Classes to Full Outlier Detection — How Classimat Generations Expanded the Fault Chart

1968
First classifying system introduced, sorting seldom-occurring thick places into four length and four thick-place classes for winding clearer setting.
1978
Classimat 2 launches as a digital computer, adding three thick-place classes and four thin-place classes — E, F, G, H1, H2, I1, I2 — plus printed reporting.
1994
Classimat 3 arrives on a standard PC platform and adds four ply-yarn thick-place classes, A0 through D0, extending the chart to 33 categories.
Present
Classimat 5 adds a capacitive sensor for fine neps, foreign matter and polypropylene contamination detection, and full outlier classification across every fault category.
THE FAULT CHART

Reading the 23-Class Fault Chart — Short Thick, Long Thick, and Long Thin

The core Classimat chart groups faults by cross-sectional increase and length into three families. Short thick faults span classes A through D, split further by severity into A1–A4, B1–B4, C1–C4 and D1–D4 — sixteen classes in total measuring faults from +100% up to +400% cross-section over lengths from 1mm to 8mm. Long thick faults occupy classes E, F and G, covering faults of lower cross-section increase but extended length, up to 80cm and beyond. Long thin faults sit in classes H and I, representing sustained drops in yarn mass that weaken the yarn far more than an equivalent thick fault.

Short Thick
Classes A – D
Sixteen classes, A1 to D4, for faults between +100% and +400% cross-section over 1mm to 8mm length. A4, B4, C3, C4, D3 and D4 are generally treated as objectionable and cleared out.
Long Thick
Classes E – G
Cover faults of moderate cross-section increase extending over much longer lengths, from 8cm up to 80cm and beyond. E and G class faults are considered objectionable in nearly every end use.
Long Thin
Classes H – I
Represent sustained mass deficiency rather than excess. These are the most critical for yarn strength since a long thin section is the point most likely to break under tension on the loom or knitting machine.
Neps
Separate Nep Count
Counted separately from thick and thin place classes since a nep is a tangled fibre knot rather than a mass deviation, and behaves differently on the clearer's optical or capacitive sensor.
FROM PRINTED REPORT TO LIVE SIGNAL

Why the Classimat Report Sitting in the Quality Office Is Not the Same as a Fault-Class Signal the Floor Can Act On

Most mills already own the data this article describes — the clearer generates a full fault-class breakdown every shift. The gap is distribution, not measurement. A printed report reviewed once a day by one quality engineer means a rising trend in long-thin faults on machine 14 goes unnoticed for two shifts, by which point the winding room has already run through several doffs at a clearing curve that no longer matches what the yarn is actually producing.

Connecting Classimat output through OPC-UA or a direct database link into a live dashboard changes that lag entirely. A supervisor sees fault-class counts trending by machine and article in real time, gets flagged the moment a class crosses its objectionable threshold, and can trace a spike back to a specific doff, shift, or raw material lot before it reaches the winding stage — not after a customer complaint arrives months later citing a fabric-stage defect nobody in the mill connected back to its source.

Every Article Needs Its Own Clearing Curve, Not the Factory Default

A dashboard pulling live Classimat data by machine, article, and shift shows exactly which fault classes are trending before they turn into a customer claim.

CLEARING CURVE OPTIMIZATION

Setting the Clearing Curve — Balancing Fault Removal Against Winding Efficiency

A clearing curve is a plot of sensitivity against reference length, drawn on the winding clearer, that decides which faults get cut and rewound as a knot. Set the curve too tight and efficiency collapses under excessive cuts on faults nobody downstream would notice. Set it too loose and objectionable faults pass straight into the fabric. The right curve depends entirely on the end use — a fine circular-knit yarn tolerates almost nothing in the long-thin classes, while a coarse denim yarn can tolerate short thick faults that would be unacceptable in a fine poplin.

End UseCritical ClassesTypical Clearing ApproachEfficiency Priority
Fine Circular KnitH2, I2, D3, D4Tight on long thin and heavy short thickMedium
Woven ShirtingC3, C4, E, GModerate on both thick and thin familiesMedium-High
Denim / Coarse WeaveE, G, H2, I2 onlyLoose on short thick classes A–CHigh
Sewing ThreadAll long thick and long thinVery tight across every classLow
ROOT CAUSE BY FAULT TYPE

What Each Fault Family Usually Means Upstream

Rising Short Thick Faults
Usually traces to drafting roller wear, uneven roller pressure, or a card sliver with poor fibre parallelization arriving at the ring frame.
Rising Long Thick Faults
Often points to piecing faults at winding, doubling errors, or a drafting wave from a worn top roller cot running over a full doff.
Rising Long Thin Faults
The most serious trend to see climbing — commonly caused by roving breaks poorly pieced back, or fibre-mass shortage from an inconsistent draw frame sliver.
Rising Nep Count
Almost always a carding issue — worn card clothing, incorrect cylinder-to-flat setting, or raw cotton with excessive trash and immature fibre content.
SAMPLING & TEST CONDITIONS

Why Sampling Method and Conditioning Change the Fault Count You See

A Classimat result is only as reliable as the package selection feeding it. Testing a handful of packages pulled from the same spindle position on the same shift will consistently understate the true fault rate of a lot, because faults cluster by spindle condition, roller wear, and raw material batch rather than distributing evenly across every package produced. A representative sample draws packages across positions, shifts, and doff cycles so the fault-class count reflects the lot as a whole rather than the cleanest corner of it.

Conditioning matters just as much as sampling. Cotton yarn tested outside the standard atmosphere of 65% relative humidity and 20°C picks up moisture-driven variation in both mass and fault detection, since a capacitive sensor reads dielectric changes that shift with moisture content. Mills that skip conditioning and test straight off the winding machine typically see fault counts drift shift to shift for reasons that have nothing to do with actual yarn quality — and chase phantom process problems as a result. A fifteen-minute standard-atmosphere hold before testing removes that noise from the data entirely.

Package Selection
Sample across spindle positions and doff stages, not from one convenient rack, to capture the true spread of fault classes across the lot.
Standard Atmosphere
Condition yarn at 65% relative humidity and 20°C before testing so moisture variation does not get misread as a fault-class trend.
Test Speed Consistency
Keep clearer test speed consistent across shifts — sensor sensitivity to fine faults can shift measurably at different running speeds.
Sensor Calibration
Recalibrate optical and capacitive sensors on the schedule the manufacturer specifies — drift here silently changes fault counts without any real process change.
BUYER QUALITY AGREEMENTS

Turning Fault-Class Data Into a Shared Language With Weavers and Knitters

Yarn quality disputes between spinner and buyer usually happen because each side is judging quality against a different, unwritten standard. Classimat classification solves that by giving both parties an objective reference — a buyer can specify a maximum count per class per unit length rather than relying on a subjective inspection of a delivered lot, and a spinner can prove conformance with the same report used to set the clearing curve in the first place.

The more mature version of this agreement ties acceptance limits to the buyer's actual process rather than a generic industry table. A circular-knit customer running fine gauge machines cares intensely about long-thin classes and barely about short thick faults their machine tolerates easily; a denim weaver cares about the opposite. Spinners that segment their clearing curve and their buyer agreements by end use, instead of running one blanket specification across every customer, consistently see fewer claims and fewer unnecessary re-clears eating into winding efficiency.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Questions Spinning and Winding Teams Ask About Classimat Fault Classification

What is the difference between an imperfection and a Classimat fault?
Imperfections are frequent, small variations in thin places, thick places, and neps, tracked on the Uster Evenness Tester as a rate per thousand metres. Classimat faults are rare, large deviations of at least a hundred percent cross-section change over at least one millimetre length, serious enough to appear as a visible defect in finished fabric. A mill needs both measurements since a good imperfection rate does not guarantee a low fault rate. Book a demo to see both tracked together on one screen.
How often should the clearing curve be reviewed for a given article?
Any time the raw material lot, count, or end-use customer changes, the curve deserves a review rather than an assumption that the previous setting still fits. Mills running the same clearing curve across different cotton lots for months at a time typically discover the mismatch only after a fabric-stage claim. A quarterly review against actual fault-class data catches drift before it becomes a claim. Contact yarn quality support to set up a scheduled clearing curve review.
Can Classimat data predict a downstream fabric defect before weaving or knitting?
Yes — long thin faults in particular correlate strongly with end breaks on the loom and knitting machine, and a rising trend in H and I classes is a reliable early warning of downstream stoppages before a single break occurs. Connecting Classimat output to a live dashboard lets a quality engineer flag that trend the same shift it appears rather than after the weaving floor reports the problem. Book a session to see predictive fault trending for your mill.
Why do buyers ask for Classimat reports as part of yarn acceptance?
Weavers, knitters, and garment makers adopted the Classimat classification decades ago as a shared language for grading yarn, since it gives both sides an objective standard for acceptance rather than a subjective visual check. A buyer requesting class-by-class fault counts is asking for proof the yarn was cleared to a curve suited to their process, not just a generic factory default. Talk to yarn quality support about generating buyer-ready fault reports automatically.
Does tightening the clearing curve always improve fabric quality?
Not necessarily — over-tightening increases the cut rate and knot count in the finished package, and every knot is itself a potential weak point and a source of fabric-stage defects if not tied correctly. The better approach is a curve matched precisely to the objectionable classes for that specific end use, which removes real risk without inflating knot count or collapsing winding efficiency unnecessarily. Book a demo to model curve changes against efficiency before applying them on the floor.
SEE YOUR FAULT DATA LIVE

Turn the Classimat Report Into a Live Signal Your Whole Floor Can Act On

Connect spinning, winding, and quality data into one view, track fault-class trends by machine and article in real time, and set clearing curves based on evidence instead of a factory default.


Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!